When creating a new class (Backorder) that EXTENDS a standard class SalesOrderType within Dynamics AX. Can anyone confirm what they believe is the correct standard to follow.
Usually I prefix name of Ax objects with organisation name for which I develop. For instance, DUG_SalesOrderType_BackOrder OR DUGSalesOrderType_BackOrder (if underscore makes the name too long).
Agreeing to object naming convention should be part of technical design standard document which all developers should adhere to.