In case of 3.6 Versions, the Item Tracking entries are being recorded as Item Ledger entries. Ie. every Item with a specific sl number has got its own Item Ledger entry. Where as in case of 3.10, every purchase/sales etc posting would used have single item ledger entry and incase the items involved tracking lines, then each of such Item ledger entry would used have several item tracking line entries(number of Tracking entries equalling to quantity of the Items posted against Item ledger entry under consideration.) I feel the entries generated in 3.10 are more desirable rather than those generated in 3.60. However, I would like to know whether any one would differ and if so, clarify as to why?
Hi, First of all look the Item Tracking functionality in Navision 3.6, They have changed the whole concepts.
I was also originally disapointed in this change, but after using 3.10 item tracking, you will soon realize that it was not a good idea. The 3.60 method is much better. The whole thing of tracking costs etc. was just a night mare. Also service and warranty tracking was difficult. The 3.60 way is definitely better.
Hi Rajesh and David Singleton, Thanks for the reply. Expiration and Warranty date info definetly is an improvement. However, it could have been achieved with single ledger entry and multiple tacking lines. And its strength with reg to costing,I am yet to explore. May be as Mr.David says, I shall be in position to appreciate the changed feature, in due course. Thanks again and Regards. Kashinath Ammanna.