If it says you have zero quantity worth, for example $20, I would do a positive adjustment for one item for $0, and a negative adjustment for one item for $20. That should retain your zero on hand and also zero the balance. Don’t know if that’s proper accounting or not.
Manish, this happens from time to time without any customization. More often with Average costing, set up per Item only, not per Item & Loc & Variant, but may happen with other methods, too. Questions about this issue regularly appear here in forum.
I would rather call it inappropriate use (or setup, or both together) than bug…
In a “normal” workflow the costing algorithms work OK, but it becomes really difficult, if POs / SOs are entered chaotically - Sales before Purchases, late entry of forgotten Purchases a half-year later, when newer Purchases exists, Items sold and are already ACIE-d… The latter hits heavily especially with Average costing.
ACIE does it’s best to handle all this mess in most cases, but not ALL - and then appear these strange “hanging” costs for Qty=0.
I am not 100% sure now, but I recall one case when the Cost was even negative - it was long ago, maybe then the issue was with some back-dated revaluation.
Every system can be brought to it’s knees if you try really hard to beat it’s bullet-proofness [;)]
**Modris Ivans Thanks for you valuable inputs… what I see in Item ledger and Value ledger entry Exactly the same as you define in you post. Some PO/SO related … I can also share that they even issue that material After GRN but before Invoice…**What you say is absolutely right.
Matt Traxinger: What you suggest i am already try that, But after posting when you run Adjust cost the same value again comes by new Inventory adjustment Entry… So it does not make seance.